Founder Playbooks
๐Ÿš€ GTM

Sales Compensation

A framework for structuring competitive, effective sales compensation plans โ€” including OTE, base/variable splits, and guardrails.

Primary Elements

  1. Structure the Core Comp PackageA well-designed comp plan motivates performance, aligns rep incentives with company goals, and helps you recruit and retain top sales talent.
    • The three primary elements: base salary (guaranteed), commission (quota-based), and equity (stock options or RSUs)
    • A 60/40 base-to-variable split is standard for quota-carrying roles at early stage
    • OTE (On Target Earnings) = base + commission at 100% quota attainment โ€” this is the number candidates compare
    • Benchmark OTE against market data for your geography, company stage, and deal size to stay competitive

Setting OTE and Base

  1. Determine the Right OTEOTE and quota must be calibrated together โ€” the right ratio ensures reps are motivated to perform without creating unsustainable payouts.
    • Set OTE based on your sales motion: land-and-expand vs. full-cycle sales typically demand different OTE structures
    • Apply the standard 4โ€“5x OTE-to-quota ratio: if OTE is $250K, quota should be $1โ€“1.25M
    • Validate the quota is achievable โ€” a quota too far above market rate at your stage will drive attrition
    • Review and reset quota annually based on actual attainment data and changes in your sales motion
  2. Calibrate the Base/Commission MixThe base/commission ratio should reflect how much of the rep's success depends on their individual effort vs. company-generated pipeline.
    • Early stage: higher base (60โ€“70%) is appropriate when the motion is still being defined and quota is harder to predict
    • As the motion matures and pipeline becomes more predictable, shift toward a 50/50 split to increase upside
    • Higher-ACV enterprise roles typically carry more base relative to variable than transactional SMB roles
    • Avoid commission-heavy plans at early stage โ€” reps will churn if they can't cover their cost of living in slow months

Guardrails

  1. Watch for Large WindfallsA single outsized deal can trigger accelerator payouts that cost far more than planned โ€” design guardrails before they become necessary.
    • Model the payout for a deal 3โ€“5x larger than quota to understand your maximum liability
    • Include a cap, kicker structure, or SVP approval requirement for deals that exceed a defined threshold
    • Discuss windfall scenarios with your finance team and board before they occur โ€” not after a $4M deal closes
    • Document the guardrail policy in the commission plan so reps understand the rules before they sign
  2. Use Accelerators and DeceleratorsAccelerators and decelerators reward overperformance and create consequences for underperformance โ€” both are essential for a fair, motivating plan.
    • Accelerator example: 110% attainment earns 120% of target commission โ€” rewards overperformance meaningfully
    • Decelerator example: 70% attainment earns 60% payout โ€” discourages accepting poor-fit deals to hit short-term numbers
    • Define clear attainment tiers (0โ€“70%, 70โ€“100%, 100โ€“120%, 120%+) with specific payout percentages
    • Review accelerator and decelerator effectiveness annually โ€” adjust if the incentive isn't driving the behavior you want
  3. Incentivize Multi-Year Deals and ExpansionHow you comp on multi-year contracts and expansion significantly affects which deals reps prioritize โ€” design these rules intentionally.
    • Define how multi-year deals count toward quota: full TCV, year-one ACV, or a combination
    • Decide whether expansion is handled by the same rep or a CS/expansion team โ€” and document the comp split
    • Create specific incentives for multi-year commitments: higher commission rate or accelerator for 2+ year deals
    • Document all scenarios in writing so there are no disputes when a large multi-year or expansion deal closes